“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.”
John F. Kennedy, Profiles in Courage

Poverty in America

Robert Reich Explains the Economy

Tea Party Pubic Service Announcement

January 24, 2009

Economic Policy Institute Issue Brief #248 - January 13, 2009

Without Adequate Public Spending, a Catastrophic Recession for Some
by Lawrence Mishel and Heidi Shierholz

This analysis sketches a picture of how much worse we can expect things to get - both for the nation as a whole and for groups of Americans that are already suffering depression-level unemployment - unless the new administration and Congress act quickly with a  recovery package that is big enough and well-targeted enough to counteract these trends.  The authors recommend government spending to the order of $600 billion per year for the next two years to head off the otherwise inevitable catastrophe.  Their analysis notes that without timely and adequate government intervention:
  • Overall unemployment, after peaking at about 10.2% in mid-2010, could still be as high as 7.6% four years from now
  • Underemployment could reach 17.9% overall in 2010 (18.8% for women), affecting over 27 million workers.
  • More than one out of every three working Americans would experience unemployment or underemployment at some point during 2010.
  • Nearly one in five African Americans in the labor force would be unemployed (18.2%).  More than half of all black teens would be jobless.
  • Hispanic unemployment would reach 13.1% overall, and more than one-third among teens.
  • Unemployment would reach a record high of 5.1% among the college-educated, 1.2 points above the previous high of 3.9% in the depths of the 1980's recession.
  • All families would experience wage declines because of weakened labor market conditions and reduced hours and wages.  On average, middle-income families would earn about $4,700 less per year in 2010 than in 2007 (a loss of 7.7%). Low-income families would lose an average of 9.8% or nearly $1,600, per year.
READ THE FULL REPORT

No comments: